Second Wellington welfare conference in two weeks locks out all but the wealthy or well-funded

Welfare reform is certainly a hot topic on the Wellington conference circuit this month.

The 'Reviewing Welfare & Social Sector Policy & Reform' conference starts today at the Town Hall, 'your opportunity to discuss the direction for social and welfare policy, while networking with like-minded people.'

And just over a week ago the Welfare Working Group hosted a forum at Victoria University aimed principally - as far as I could see, anyway - at convincing the 250 attendees that our benefit system is in crisis and must be brought into line with places like Australia and the UK.

You couldn't get a blade of grass between them in terms of topic.

However, when it comes to cost, the Victoria Uni bash was free to those allowed in the door - while the latest effort comes at the pretty price of $2,295 plus GST.

I don't know who can afford this. I certainly can't, and I doubt there are many beneficiaries, beneficiary advocates, community workers or students with an interest in this area who can either.

One of the key groups of people who should be involved in the current discussions around welfare are those who work every day with beneficiaries and their families.

Yet most of the organisations for whom they work are chronically underfunded, and the chances they'll be able to cough up even half the entrance fee for this week's bun-fight are marginal.

It is ironic that the second, expensive conference offers a far more balanced lineup of speakers from different parts of the welfare debate, while denying many who care passionately about the subject the chance to attend.

Who will get into the room the second time around?

Without doing a survey at the door I have no real way of knowing, but my guess would be that Government departments will be sending a goodly number of policy analysts and funding managers along, as will large NGOs with big Government contracts, plus private sector organisations with an interest in working out whether possible moves to an insurance-based welfare model may provide excellent profit taking opportunities in future.

It feels to me that the two conferences are virtually a metaphor for what the Government is seeking to do.

The first forum was free, but had a rundown feel to it.  Many attendees criticised it for the lack of opportunities for any genuine debate, the imbalance in the range of speakers, especially in the plenary sessions, and the sense that overall it was an opportunity for the Government to push its own agenda down people's throats.

The second conference, on the other hand, has greater balance, more local focus and deeper analysis on offer - but many of those who attended the first forum are locked out by price.

The debate itself has been privatised.

I also await with interest any news of what Paula Bennett might have to say at the opening of today's conference.

On 9 June she startled participants in the Welfare Working Group forum by the brevity of her opening address, refusing to give any details of her policy intentions at all, saying she was there 'to listen' - and then promptly left.

It will be intriguing to see whether the Minister who is leading the whole drive towards what could potentially be the biggest reform of our welfare system in generations has anything of substance to say today, or whether she will continue to allow people like Paula Rebstock, David Caygill, Roger Kerr and the Maxim Institute's representatives to do her talking for her.

It's just a pity that whatever insights on Government intentions Paula Bennett has to share today will be heard only by those wealthy or well funded enough to be in the room.

Comments (7)

by Andrew Geddis on June 21, 2010
Andrew Geddis

Sue,

I agree that conferences like this one are a curse. They get put together by a private company (Conferenz) who pull in a bunch of speakers who they don't pay (the most you get is a "free" ticket to bring along someone else) and then hawk the event to primarily government-funded individuals who pay the extortionate fees from their conference budget. Having been approached to speak at them previously, I've declined on ethical grounds. It'd be nice if every other academic did likewise - be the end of this little racket.

by Bruce Thorpe on June 21, 2010
Bruce Thorpe

Kia ora Sue,

Pleased to see you writing a column.

I agree with Andrew's comments about conference business tapping into the budgets of government departments with well funded budgets out of proportion to their delivery of positive outcomes. The Department of Corrections immediately comes to mind.

 

by stuart munro on June 22, 2010
stuart munro

The day will come when NZ gets a government that realizes robbing the poor box is not a credible substitute for economic policy.

Not in our lifetimes, it seems. These are the dark ages.

by Ian MacKay on June 23, 2010
Ian MacKay

Paula Bennett will say: "We have consulted widely and this confirms what I thought."

I wonder if questions will be asked at the cost to someone or some Government body?

by on September 16, 2011
Anonymous

Tom Brady Jersey,Miles Austin Jersey I was Brett Favre Jersey starting Donovan McNabb Jersey to pick Tony Romo Jersey that up Aaron Rodgers Jersey and getting Eli Manning Jersey the hang LaDainian Tomlinson Jersey out of Michael Vick Jersey it and get comfortable, Troy Polamalu Jersey made some plays in practice. Now the D-line,Peyton Manning Jersey so hopefully Willie Parker Jersey if anything, that’s what I’ve shown.”

by on September 17, 2011
Anonymous

Canada Goose Yorkville Parka Recently, Canada Goose Trillium Parka there has Canada Goose Free Style Vest been a Canada Goose Gloves lot of talk in the Canada Goose Glove Black media about the healthy state of Canada’s Canada Goose Glove Black Dark financial system and by extension their banks. Canada Goose Glove Navy This has piqued my interest and therefore I have chosen the 5 of Canada’s largest banks as the subject for this article.

by on May 08, 2012
Anonymous

Polo Ralph Lauren Outlet If the a lot of simple summer said dressed up, is a bargain Polo Outlet T-shirt with a brace of jeans that go out, both for the accessibility simple, do not breach afresh fashion, a lot of time become abounding adorableness who aboriginal choice;Polo Ralph Lauren Sale Look simple bargain POLOT the T-shirt with jeans, in fact in the Polo T-shirt selected, is aswell charge a lot of mind! Today let Ralph Lauren Men accouterment baby accomplish up for all the girls acclaim a nice and clear bargain Polo T-shirt, let your absorbing a summer!

Post new comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.